How to pick an offer you should refuse
When it pretends to offer you more than you ever dreamed possible.
--Uses as bait completely reactionary items
---Does not add anything that isn't still currently drawing punters ( mirror of the above )
---Does not build on the past but relies on the new ( often not tested properly yet for sustainability )
-- keeps its distance from agencies spawned by quickfiz stupidity ( really smart)
And if still in doubt
--Hopes that the volume ( quantity of reasons . credentials ) will win over the content ( The sound sustainable way is a narrow road with specific targets -- has some age on it- anathema to the quick fiz agent Volume gives apparent value to sales pitch
Philip Adams is smart enough to not be specific . Why does he not admit his contempt for the ease with which the people are fooled and how things become popular .
Maybe not smart enough to recognize his contempt for his own shallowness and hypocrisy?
